Welcome to my web log. See the first post for an introduction. See the archive page for all posts, and comments for a feed of comments only. (There is an english language feed if you don't want to see Finnish.)
All content outside of comments is copyrighted by Lars Wirzenius, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Comments are copyrighted by their authors.
Half a year ago I wrote a blog post about debugging over email. This is a follow-up.
The blog post summarised:
Have an automated way to collect all usual informaion needed for debugging: versions, config and log files, etc.
Improve error messages so the users can solve their issues themselves.
Give users better automated diagnostics tools.
Based on further thinking and feedback, I add:
When a program notices a problem that may indicate a bug in it, it should collect the necessary information itself, automatically, in a way that the user just needs to send to the developers / support.
The primary goal should be to help people solve their own problems.
A secondary goal is to make the problem reproducible by the developers, or otherwise make it easy to fix bugs without access to the original system where the problem was manifested.
I've not written any code to help with this remote debugging, but it's something I will start experimenting with in the near future.
Further ideas welcome.
I participated in Nanowrimo in November, but I failed to actually finish the required 50,000 words during the month. Oh well. I plan on finishing the book eventually, anyway.
Furthermore, as an open source exhibitionist I thought I'd publish a chapter each month. This will put a bit of pressure on me to keep writing, and hopefully I'll get some nice feedback too.
The working title is "Hacker Noir". I've put the first chapter up on http://noir.liw.fi/.
I spent a few days in Cambridge for a minidebconf. This is a tiny version of the full annual Debconf. We had a couple of days for hacking, and another two days for talks.
I spent my hacking time on thinking about vmdebootstrap (my tool for generating disk images with an installed Debian), and came to the conclusion I need to atone my sins for writing such crappy code by rewriting it from scratch to be nicer to use. I gave a talk about this, too. The mailing list post has the important parts, and meetings-archive has a video.
I haven't started the rewrite, and it's not going to make it for stretch.
I also gave two other talks, on the early days of Linux, and Qvarn, the latter being what I do at work.
Thank you to ARM, for sponsoring the location, and the other sponsors for sponsoring food. These in-real-life meetings between developers are important for the productivity and social cohesion of Debian.
I have just released version 1.20 of Obnam, my backup program. It's been nine months since the previous release, and that's a long time: I've had an exciting year, and not entirely in a good way. Unfortuntely that's eaten up a lot of my free time and enthusiasm for my hobby projects.
I've received patches and actionable bug reports from a number of people, and I'm grateful for those. I try to credit them by name in the NEWS file.
This file summarizes changes between releases of Obnam.
NOTE: Obnam has an EXPERIMENTAL repository format under
green-albatross-20160813. It is NOT meant
for real use. It is likely to change in incompatible ways without
warning. DO NOT USE it unless you're willing to lose your backup.
Version 1.20, released 2016-10-29
The format name for
green-albatrossis renamed to
green-albatross-20160813and will henceforth be renamed every time there's a change, to avoid confusing Lars because of backwards incompatibilities. When it reaches stability and the on-disk format is frozen, it'll be renamed back to a date-less version.
Those using the experimental green-albatross repository format will have to start over with fresh repositories. This release contains backwards incompatible changes that mean existing repositories no longer work. Sorry, but that's what experimental means.
A green-albatross change is that the "chunk index" data structure is no longer a single blob, and instead it's broken down into smaller objects. This avoids keeping all of the chunk indexes in memory at once, which should reduce memory use.
Remi Rampin started updating and continuing the French translation of the Obnam manual.
Lars Wirzenius changed the default so that Obnam reads random data when creating encryption key from
/dev/random. The goal is to make it less likely that Obnam stops at the key generation stage on machines with little entropy. Set
weak-random = noin your configuration to override this.
Lars Wirzenius changed
obnam forgetso that if there is nothing to do, it doesn't even try to connect to the repository.
Lars Wirzenius added a chapter on participating in the Obnam project to the manual.
Lars Wirzenius changed
--one-file-systemto work for bind mounts. It only works for bind mounts that exist at the time when Obnam starts, however. Also,
/proc/mountsmust be an accurate list of mount points.
Lars Wirzenius added the gpg command line to the error message about gpg failing.
The manual and manual page used to claim you could break only the locks for one client. This was not true. The manuals has been fixed.
A whole bunch of typo fixes, from Andrea Gelmini.
Michel Alexandre Salim fixed a bug in the FUSE (obnam mount) plugin, which was a typo in a method name (
Lars Wirzenius fixed
obnam restoreto require a target set with
--to. Jonathan Dowland reported the problem.
Lars Wirzenius fixed
obnam list-errorsso that it doesn't crash on error classes that only exist to make the exception hierarchy neater, such as
EncryptionError. Bug reported by Rik Theys.
Ian Cambell fixed a bug in
obnam kdirstatand its handling of FIFO sockets.
We needed a router and wifi access point in the office, and simultaneously both I and my co-worker Ivan needed such a thing at our respective homes. After some discussion, and after reading articles in Ars Technica about building PCs to act as routers, we decided to do just that.
The PC solution seem to offer better performance, but this is actually not a major reason for us.
We want to have systems we understand and can hack. A standard x86 PC running Debian sounds ideal to use.
Why not a cheap commercial router? They tend to be opaque and mysterious, and can't be managed with standard tooling such as Ansible. They may or may not have good security support. Also, they may or may not have sufficient functionality to be nice things, such as DNS for local machines, or the full power if iptables for firewalling.
Why not OpenWRT? Some models of commercial routers are supported by OpenWRT. Finding good hardware that is also supported by OpenWRT is a task in itself, and not the kind of task especially I like to do. Even if one goes this route, the environment isn't quite a standard Linux system, because of various hardware limitations. (OpenWRT is a worthy project, just not our preference.)
We got some hardware:
|Barebone||Qotom Q190G4, VGA, 2x USB 2.0, 134x126x36mm, fanless||130€|
|CPU||Intel J1900, 2-2.4GHz quad-core||-|
|NIC||Intel WG82583, 4x 10/100/1000||-|
|Memory||Crucial CT102464BF160B, 8GB DDR3L-1600 SODIMM 1.35V CL11||40€|
|SSD||Kingston SSDNow mS200, 60GB mSATA||42€|
|WLAN||AzureWave AW-NU706H, Ralink RT3070L, 300M 802.11b/g/n, half mPCIe||17€|
|mPCIe adapter||Half to full mPCIe adapter||3€|
|Antennas||2x 2.4/5GHz 6dBi, RP-SMA, U.FL Cables||7€|
These were bought at various online shops, including AliExpress and verkkokauppa.com.
After assembling the hardware, we installed Debian on them:
Connect the PC to a monitor (VGA) and keyboard (USB), as well as power.
I built a "factory image" to be put on the SSD, and a USB stick installer image, which includes the factory one. Write the installer image on a USB stick, boot off that, then copy the factory image to the SSD and reboot off the SSD.
The router now runs a very bare-bones, stripped-down Debian system, which runs a DHCP server on eth3 (marked LAN4 on the box). You can log as root on the console (no password), or via ssh, but for ssh you need to replace the
/home/ansible/.ssh/authorized_keysfile with one that contains only your public ssh key.
Connect a laptop to the Ethernet port marked LAN4, and get an IP address with DHCP.
Log in with ssh to
email@example.com, and verify that
sudo idworks without password. Except you can't do this, unless you put in your ssh key in the authorized keys file above.
Git clone the ansible playbooks, adjust their parameters in
minipc-router.ymlas wanted, and run the playbook. Then reboot the router again.
You should now have wifi, routing (with NAT), and be generally speaking able to do networking.
There's a lot of limitations and problems:
There's no web UI for managing anything. If you're not comfortable doing sysadmin via ssh (with or without ansible), this isn't for you.
No IPv6. We didn't want to enable it yet, until we understand it better. You can, if you want to.
No real firewalling, but adjust
roles/router/files/ferm.confas you wish.
The router factory image is 4 GB in size, and our SSD is 60 GB. That's a lot of wasted space.
The router factory image embeds our public keys in the
ansibleuser's authorized keys file for ssh. This is because we built this for ourselves first. If there's interest by others in using the images, we'll solve this.
Probably a lot of stupid things. Feel free to tell us what it is (firstname.lastname@example.org would be a good address for that).
If you'd like to use the images and Ansible playbooks, please do. We'd be happy to get feedback, bug reports, and patches. Send them to me (email@example.com) or my ticketing system (firstname.lastname@example.org).
A year ago I got tired of Jenkins and wrote a CI system for myself, Ick. It's served me well since, but it's a bit clunky and awkward and I have to hope nobody else wants to use it.
I've been thinking about re-architecting Ick from scratch, and so I wrote down some of my thinking about this. It's very raw, but just in case someone else might be interested, I put it online at ick2.
At this point I'm still thinking about very high level concepts. I've not written any code, and probably won't in the next couple of months. But I had to get this out of my brain.
I gave a talk about the early days of Linux at the jubilee symposium arranged by the University of Helsinki CS department. Below is an outline of what I meant to speak about, but the actual talk didn't follow it exactly. You can compare these to the video once it comes online.
- Linus and I met at uni, the only 2 Swedish speaking new students that year, so we naturally migrated towards each other.
- After a year away for military service, got back in touch, summer of
- C & Unix course fall of 1990; Minix.
- Linus didn't think atime updates in real time were plausible, but I showed him; funnily enough, atime updates have been an issue in Linux until fairly recently, since they slow things down (without being particularly useful)
- Jan 5, 1991 bought his first PC (i386 + i387 + 4 MiB RAM and a small hard disk); he had a Sinclair QL before that.
- Played Prince of Persia for a couple of months.
- Then wanted to learn i386 assembly and multitasking.
- A/B threading demo.
- Terminal emulation, Usenet access from home.
- Hard disk driver, mistaking hard disk for a modem.
- More ambition, announced Linux to the world for the first time
- first ever Linux installation.
- Upload to ftp.funet.fi, directory name by Ari Lemmke.
- Originally not free software, licence changed early 1992.
- First mailing list was created and introduced me to a flood of email (managed with VAX/VMS MAIL and later mush on Unix).
- I talked a lot with Linus about design at this time, but never really participated in the kernel work (partly because disagreeing with Linus is a high-stress thing).
- However, I did write the first sprintf for the kernel, since Linus hadn't learnt about varargs functions in C; he then ruined it and added the comment "Wirzenius wrote this portably..." (add google hit count for wirzenius+fucked).
- During 1992 Linux grew fast, and distros happened, and a lot of packaging and porting of software; porting was easier because Linus was happy to add/change things in the kernel to accomodate software
- A lot of new users during 1992 as well.
- End of 1992 I and a few others founded the Linux Documentation Project to help all the new users, some of who didn't come from a Unix background.
- In fact, things progressed so fast in 1992 that Linus thought he'd release 1.0 very soon, resulting in a silly sequence of version numbers: 0.12, 0.95, 0.96, 0.96b, 0.96c, 0.96c++2.
- X server ported to Linux; almost immediate prediction of the year of the Linux desktop never happening unless ALL the graphics cards were supported immediately.
- Linus was of the opinion that you needed one process (not thread) per window in X; I taught him event driven programming.
- Bug in network code, resulting in ban on uni network.
- Pranks in the shared office room.
- We released 1.0 in an event at the CS dept in March, 1994; this included some talks and a ritual compilation of the release version during the event.
Today it is 23 years ago since Ian Murdock published his intention to develop a new Linux distribution, Debian. It also about 20 years since I became a Debian developer and made my first package upload.
In the time since:
I've retired a couple of times, to pursue other interests, and then un-retired.
I've maintained a bunch of different packages, most importantly the PGP2 software in the 90s. (I now only maintain software for which I'm also upstream, in order to make jokes about my upstream being an unco-operative jerk, and my packager being unhelpful in the extreme.)
Got kicked out from the Debian mailing lists for insulting another developer. Not my proudest moment. I was allowed back later, and I've tried to be polite ever since. (See also rules 6.)
I've been to a few Debconfs (3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15). I'm looking forward to going to many more in the future. It's clear that seeing many project members at least every now and then has a very big impact on project cohesion.
I had a gig where I was paid to improve the technical quality of Debian. After a few months of bug fixing (which isn't my favourite pastime), I wrote piuparts in order to find new bugs. (I gave that project away many years ago, but it seems to still be going strong.)
I've almost ran for DPL twice, but I'm glad I didn't actually. I've carefully avoided any positions of power or responsibility in the project. (I live in fear that someone decides to nominate me for something where I'd actually have make important decisions.)
Not being responsible means I can just ignore the project for a while when something annoying happens. (Or retire again.) With such a large project, eventually something really annoying does happen.
Came up with the DEP process with Zack and Dato. I also ran the second half of the DEP5 process to get the debian/copyright machine readable format accepted. (I'm no longer involved, though, and I don't think DEP is much now.)
I've taught several workshops about Debian packaging, including online for Debian-Women. It's always fun when others "get" how easy packaging really is, despite all the efforts of the larger variety in tooling and random web pages go to to obscure the fundamental simplicity.
Over the years Í've enjoyed many of the things developed within Debian (without claiming any credit for myself):
the policy manual, perhaps the most important technical achievement of the project
the social contract and Debian free software guidelines, unarguably the most important non-technical achievements of the project
the whole package management system, but especially apt
debhelper's dh, which made the work of packaging simple cases so easy it's nearly a no-brainer
d-i made me not hate installing Debian (although I think time is getting ripe to replace d-i with something new; catch me in a talkative mood at party to hear more)
Debian-Women made an almost immediate improvement to the culture of the larger project (even if there's still much too few women developers)
the diversity statement made me a lot happier about being a project member.
I'd like to thank everyone who's worked on these and made them happen. These are important milestones in Debian.
I've opened my mount in a lot of places over the years, which means a lot of people know of me, but nobody can actually point at anything useful I've actually done. Which is why when I've given talks at, say, FOSDEM, I get introduced as "the guy who shared an office with Linus Torvalds a long time ago".
I've made a number of friends via participation in Debian. I've found jobs via contacts in Debian, and have even started a side business with someone.
It's been a good twenty years. And the fun ain't over yet.
I write free software and I have some users. My primary support channels are over email and IRC, which means I do not have direct access to the system where my software runs. When one of my users has a problem, we go through one or more cycles of them reporting what they see and me asking them for more information, or asking them to try this thing or that thing and report results. This can be quite frustrating.
I want, nay, need to improve this. I've been thinking about this for a while, and talking with friends about it, and here's my current ideas.
First idea: have a script that gathers as much information as possible, which the user can run. For example, log files, full configuration, full environment, etc. The user would then mail the output to me. The information will need to be anonymised suitably so that no actual secrets are leaked. This would be similar to Debian's package specific reportbug scripts.
Second idea: make it less likely that the user needs help solving their issue, with better error messages. This would require error messages to have sufficient explanation that a user can solve their problem. That doesn't necessarily mean a lot of text, but also code that analyses the situation when the error happens to include things that are relevant for the problem resolving process, and giving error messages that are as specific as possible. Example: don't just fail saying "write error", but make the code find out why writing caused an error.
Third idea: in addition to better error messages, might provide diagnostics tools as well.
A friend suggested having a script that sets up a known good set of operations and verifies they work. This would establish a known-working baseline, or smoke test, so that we can rule things like "software isn't completely installed".
Do you have ideas? Mail me (email@example.com) or tell me on identi.ca (@liw) or Twitter (@larswirzenius).
For more, see the archive.